Anxiety, Disruptive Protest, and Climate Action
A great many people are anxious about the climate. Some are living under a cloud of despair. Some are worried
Read moreA great many people are anxious about the climate. Some are living under a cloud of despair. Some are worried
Read moreWhat is it that has stopped the United States from dealing successfully with the climate crisis? We’ve known for at least 3 decades that we needed to act, but instead we’ve allowed the problem to get much worse. Is it the climate deniers? Is it people not taking lowering their “personal carbon footprints” seriously enough? Is it politicians who just don’t get it?
No! It is none of the above. The big barrier has been the fossil fuel companies–and the way they exert political power and manipulate public opinion. Climate denial was created by a deceitful disinformation campaign funded by ExxonMobil and others. The whole idea of a “personal carbon footprint” was a ploy invented by the PR department of BP Oil to distract the public from the huge responsibility borne by the fossil fuel industry. The politicians have been paid not to “get it.” Senator Joe Manchin, who recently sank the Build Back Better bill, has his own financial stake in the coal industry, and he also has taken in more the $400,000 in donations from oil and gas companies just in the last few months. He’s also the top lifetime recipient of oil, gas, and coal money among all those in Congress.
These companies have pursued their own profit and greed with abandon, while knowing that their very business itself was creating a climate crisis that threatens the existence of civilization as we know it. They have expanded their extraction and marketing dramatically, while climate scientists have been making it clear that fossil fuels must be eliminated entirely. They have used money, lies, and high-paid public relations experts to undermine every effort to address the climate crisis.
A new report, just out, ….
Read moreIf earlier reports from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were wake-up calls to take climate action, the one released in early April is a blaring emergency horn that the world dare not ignore. In a statement accompanying the report, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said that the failure of governments and corporations to keep pledges and take effective climate action has “put us firmly on track toward an unlivable world.”
The report indicates that in order to keep global warming within the 1.5°C target, greenhouse gas emissions can continue to rise for only 3 more years. They must fall 43% by 2030. The scientists report that this is still possible, but that unless transformative climate action is taken in the next 8 years, the 1.5°C target will be out of reach forever. Unless countries step up their reductions in emissions, we are on course for a global temperature rise of 2.4°C to 3.5°C. This would bring unimaginable devastation to populations everywhere.
I have not plowed through the entire 3,675 pages of this latest report, but in the summaries and articles about it there are items of good news. The first is ….
Read moreOne of the most useful concepts I’ve encountered in working with people and organizations is the concept of “distress patterns.” While distress patterns themselves are generally harmful and can interfere with individual relationships and with organizations–including groups tackling racism and climate change–understanding them is potentially transformative. Here is an introduction.
You may have noticed that people often respond to life in repetitive ways, that is to say there are patterns in their thinking, feelings and behavior. Some people frequently feel discouraged; some are always trying to take care of other people; some tend to feel victimized; some frequently try to dominate other people or situations; and many of us feel that we are essentially on our own and no one really understands us.
There are many ways that psychologists, therapists, and people in general think about these issues. Many approaches contain ideas that people have found helpful. I find the concept of distress patterns distinctive its power to explain people’s behavior and in its potential to help people and groups move forward.
At our best, we humans are flexible, creative, and smart; we like other people; and we are glad to be alive. We think and function in ways that fit the present situation, connect us with other people, and contribute to advancing the goals we care most about. When distress patterns occupy our minds ….
Read moreThe IPCC (the climate change scientific body of the UN) recently released another report verifying that climate change is having disastrous effects in many parts of the world—even worse than previously understood. This is not the news we want to hear, of course. However, it does remind us that the climate crisis is shared by all of humanity. If we can remember more often that we are each part of a global community, connected to people everywhere by our shared humanity, we are more likely to be able to handle bad news about the climate. We will be more likely to let bad news spur us to take increasing action to make whatever difference we can in the climate crisis.
The new climate report was released 4 days after Russia invaded Ukraine. A Ukrainian botanist on the IPCC had to make his last text checks on the report from a bomb shelter in Kyiv. Meteorologist Svitlana Krakovska, the head of the Ukrainian IPCC delegation said, “We will not surrender in Ukraine, and we hope the world will not surrender in building a climate resilient future. Human-induced climate change and the war on Ukraine have the same roots—fossil fuels—and our dependence on them.”
Read moreOur current economic system in the United States and throughout most of the world is complex, but some of its prominent features are:
1. Decisions are made on the basis of what will be most profitable, not on the basis of what will serve the common good or the health of the planet
2. Tremendous amounts of wealth continue to be accumulated by a small number of people, while many people have very little. (In the U.S. today the top 10% of the population has 70% of the wealth, while the bottom 50% of the population has 2% of the wealth.)
3. The system depends on endless growth–in production, extraction, and consumption.
Such a system has many consequences. Two major consequences are:
1. This system has caused and is perpetuating the devastating global climate crisis.
2. This system makes it very difficult, and in some cases impossible, to do what needs to be done to solve the climate crisis.
This is not to say that we must create a new economic system before we can do anything about climate change. As we take action on the climate crisis, however, we will need to challenge the current economic system on many fronts. We will need to think and act outside its prevailing paradigms, especially the three identified at the top of this piece….
Read moreIn my previous post I offered some “tips on stepping up our climate action” and encouraged us all to take action more frequently despite any feelings of discouragement or despair. I proposed that we each 1) decide to act, 2)take some action, 3) be pleased that we have acted, 4) repeat the first 3 steps again, over and over.
While I mentioned some possible actions in that post, it seems that some more specific, personal examples might be useful.
I’m not yet as bold and effective in my climate action as I aspire to be, but I do persist and do a number of things that are helping me get connected to other people and, I believe, make a difference. In the hope that these examples will lead you to think further about what you want to do, here are a few of the things I’ve been engaged in recently.
I learned, through an email from 350.org, that a federal judge voided a huge sale of drilling leases in the Gulf of Mexico that the federal government had recently completed. This is such good news, because …
Read moreWe continue to make slow progress on climate change in the United States. More of the population is concerned about the situation, more political leaders are advocating action, and a few businesses are reducing their carbon footprints. But slow progress is not what we need in the climate emergency we are facing. Only dramatic acceleration of our action on climate will give us any chance of avoiding global catastrophe.
With the failure of the Congress to pass the Build Back Better bill and with big businesses mostly trying to improve their PR campaigns instead of actually cutting emissions, it is clear that neither government nor business on their own can be relied on to solve this crisis. Only a very large people’s movement demanding bold action has any chance of accelerating action sufficiently.
We have a good climate movement in the U.S. with bold solutions, but it needs far more people actively engaged. I propose that most of us could be more engaged, and all of us could be doing more to get other people join in taking action.
Read moreSeventy percent of the U.S. population is worried about climate change. Scientists are clear about what needs to happen. It is possible and doable, yet it isn’t happening.
Clearly there are forces at work preventing our government, businesses, and society from turning to face the climate crisis and do everything that needs to be done as rapidly as possible. What is it that is pushing the other way?
This is a complex question with many answers, but in this post I’d like to look at the role that white supremacy is playing. My goal is not to blame white people, but to help us all to deepen our understanding of what is happening so we can all be more effective in contributing to the changes that are needed for our planet to remain a habitable home for human beings.
Read moreIf you feel anxious about the climate situation, you have lots of company. Virtually everyone has some anxiety about the mess we are in with climate change, whether they want to face it or not. Google searches for “climate anxiety” went up 565% last year. A recent poll found 70% of U.S.ers are worried about climate change.
I’m going to say some unpleasant things in this post, but I promise some useful, more auspicious, perspectives and suggestions before the end, if you can get that far.
If you’ve been following the climate situation, you know that things are bad and that even under the best-case scenario they are going to get worse–everywhere. Yikes! Even if we already know that’s true, it’s a shocking statement to say that things are going to get worse. (Aren’t things bad enough already? Is anyone thinking … COVID pandemic, rising authoritarianism, racism, economic inequality, financial insecurity?)
How do we manage our feelings in this situation? What’s a healthy emotional response?
Read moreIf you are reading this, you are one of the people who has survived another challenging year. Congratulations! Thank you for your continued caring about climate change and climate justice.
What a year it has been! The coronavirus pandemic is hard on all of us and seems endless. Our democracy in the United States is in peril. The climate crisis continues to worsen–some good actions have been taken, but they are still woefully in adequate.
President Biden has been far bolder on climate than anyone would have guessed when he first announced that he would run for President, but he’s also failed to take essential climate action steps that are within his power.
There’s been plenty of bad climate news this year and some good news too. I’m going to trust that you have some picture of how dire the situation is and not trouble you with reviewing the bad news in this post. Here are three bits of good news that are helping me stay hopeful–and committed to climate action in the coming year.
Also here are the five posts of this blog in 2021 that contain perspectives and information most likely to be important in 2022.
Read moreAs I’ve written before, talking about climate change is critical to building a powerful people’s climate movement. Lots of people are vaguely concerned about the climate, but many of those aren’t yet speaking up or taking action. It would be good for us to talk about climate change with almost everyone. Sharing our love for the planet, sharing some information about climate change, and inviting people to join us in taking action, is vital to moving things forward. Having some key facts at our fingertips, committed to memory, can make us better communicators and enliven our interactions. Once I’ve chosen a number to remember, I find I retain it better if I make a point of sharing it often in conversations.
Here is a small collection of key numbers and facts you can use when talking with people about climate change.
Read moreMany nations, corporations, municipalities, and other entities are setting goals to be “net-zero by 2050,” that is, to have zero net greenhouse gas emissions by the year 2050. While this may seem like an admirable goal, there are significant and dangerous problems with this whole approach.
In 2018 the IPCC issued a report in which it emphasized that in order for humanity to keep global warming below 1.5°C it was necessary for the world to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 45% by 2030 and to “net-zero” by 2050. The “net-zero” in this statement was an acknowledgement that no matter how vigorously we cut emissions, there will likely still be small amounts of emissions (mostly in some industrial processes) that we can’t totally eliminate and these will have to be balanced by equivalent increases in carbon sequestration. This IPCC statement was accurate, but has been distorted and misused in multiple ways.
Problem #1 – Ignoring the 2030 goal
First the 2030 goal and the 2050 goal in the IPCC report are paired with each other and must be implemented together. Many of the current adoptions of the 2050 goal are ignoring, or failing to even come close, to the 2030 target. “Net-zero by 2050” is a recipe for disaster if we don’t first reduce emissions by 45% by 2030. Here’s why: